IBB, Prince Sixtus Fires Fani-Kayode: ‘Stop Promoting Ethnic Division, Let’s Unite Nigeria with the Truth'”- Sixt-Media Lane
……..”Ethnic Champion or Truth-Teller? IBB, Amb Prince Sixtus Opara Calls Out Femi Fani-Kayode for Distorting History”
Ethnic Champions distorts history to suite their divisive devilish agenda while trying to recreate History.
Badamosi Babangida, a former Military president and a major player in the Nigeria polity, politics and history have come out to Set the Record Straight on Nigeria’s History” via his recent book titled “A Journey In The Service” which is revealing indeed.
But it now seems that the book is actually causing sleepless nights for haters and sadists like Femi fani kayode who derives joy in instigating crisis and erupting chaos with his divisive mindset.
Setting the Record Straight: Debunking Femi Fani-Kayode’s Misrepresentation of General Ibrahim Babangida’s Book
General Ibrahim Babangida’s recent memoir, “A Journey in Service”, has ignited a firestorm of controversy surrounding the 1966 coup, which some have erroneously labeled an “Igbo Coup”. In his book, Babangida unequivocally states that the coup lacked ethnic undertones, aiming to put the matter to rest. However, Femi Fani-Kayode, notorious for his divisive rhetoric and ethnic bias, has seen fit to distort Babangida’s words, perpetuating a false narrative that the coup was indeed ethnically motivated and unjustly blaming the Igbo.
This blatant misrepresentation is a stark reminder of the dangers of revisionist history and the importance of accuracy in public discourse. Fani-Kayode’s actions are a disservice to the truth and serve only to further divide and inflame ethnic tensions.
Babangida, a detribalized statesman, has since come out to correct Fani-Kayode’s misinterpretation, attributing his error to a biased mindset. It is essential that we set the record straight and reject Fani-Kayode’s divisive rhetoric.
The 1966 coup was a complex event with multiple factors at play. To reduce it to simplistic ethnic narratives is to do a disservice to history and the individuals involved. Babangida’s book provides a nuanced and balanced account of the events, one that is grounded in fact and devoid of ethnic bias.
In contrast, Fani-Kayode’s misrepresentation is a stark example of how ethnic prejudice can cloud one’s judgment, leading to the distortion of historical facts. His actions are a reminder that we must remain vigilant in the face of misinformation and divisive rhetoric.
As we move forward, it is essential that we prioritize accuracy and truth in our public discourse. We must reject attempts to distort history for selfish or divisive purposes. General Babangida’s book is a valuable contribution to our understanding of Nigeria’s complex history, and we must ensure that its message is not hijacked by those seeking to promote ethnic divisions.
Let us set the record straight and reject Fani-Kayode’s misrepresentation. Let us prioritize truth, accuracy, and unity in our public discourse.
About The Author
